With net migration to Australia reaching 445,510, it has surpassed projections and sparked worries about infrastructure and housing. Is this rate of growth sustainable?

With the current estimate of one migrant arrival per minute, the Australian government is facing unprecedented pressure. This inflow has greatly outpaced the aim for net foreign migration, casting doubt on the prime minister’s pledge to lower migration numbers.


Some Australians worry that this influx would put too much strain on public services and housing, while others see it as a possible boon to the country’s economy. Aside from raising concerns about the availability of housing and the sustainability of infrastructure, the rapid growth in migration has also resulted in rising living expenses.

Recent data indicates that the government’s objective of 395,000 for the current fiscal year has already been surpassed by an amazing 445,510 net permanent and long-term arrivals. Despite missing a month’s worth of data, this statistic shows a significant departure from official estimates, casting doubt on the government’s capacity to successfully manage migration.

Many Australians are experiencing increased financial difficulty as a result of growing housing and rental expenses. There are still COVID-19 travel limitations in place, although there are signs of improvement. May saw a 17.3% increase in short-term tourists to 600,780 and a 14.2% increase in resident returns to 807,920, indicating a strong trend in the return of travellers worldwide.

25,940 net permanent and long-term arrivals were recorded in May 2024, making it the second-highest monthly total ever—only surpassed by May 2023. More than 445,510 migrants have landed in Australia since July 2023, with an average of 1,607 arrivals per day—roughly the same as four Boeing 747s landing per day.

The most recent statistics emphasises how the federal government has fallen short of its promise to reduce migration levels. The current data show a notable overrun of the government’s net overseas migration goal, even in light of a recent pledge to cut the yearly immigration intake in half. Critics contend that rather than attending to the interests of the Australian population at large, Australia’s immigration policy appears to favour large corporations and universities.

This circumstance emphasises the necessity for a balanced strategy to migration, one that appropriately manages the constraints on housing, infrastructure, and services in addition to maximising the economic benefits of skilled migration. Finding a balance that promotes both the nation’s economic progress and citizens’ well-being will be a challenge for the administration.